Verified Supplement Data Evidence-based supplement comparisons

The Supplement Cost-per-Effective-Dose & Evidence Dataset

By Verified Supplement Data · v1.0 · Reviewed · Methodology

Free and open (CC BY 4.0). 72 supplement products across 16 categories, each with its elemental dose, cost per clinically-effective daily dose, third-party certification, an evidence grade, and the PubMed IDs behind that grade. Built for journalists, researchers, developers, and anyone who wants supplement data that's actually structured and sourced.

⬇ Download CSV ⬇ Download JSON

New · v1.0

Ingredient Master Dataset — every layer, joined

The dataset above is product-level. This one is ingredient-level: one row per ingredient (27 of them) that fuses five separate data layers into a single record — so you can see, for any ingredient at a glance, what it costs to dose it properly, what the studied dose is, how often it shows up in FDA adverse-event reports, how many people are actually deficient, and whether a third-party-tested option even exists.

  • Cost per effective dose — min, median, and our top pick per ingredient (our proprietary normalization)
  • Clinical dose target — the studied dose (PubMed-cited), present for 13/27
  • FDA CAERS/FAERS safety signal — total adverse events, serious-event rate, top reaction, present for 19/27
  • NHANES deficiency prevalence — who's actually deficient, present for the 5 nutrients NHANES measures
  • Certification availability — whether any third-party-tested product exists in the category at all

⬇ Master CSV ⬇ Master JSON

Coverage is uneven by design — we only join a layer where the source actually has the ingredient (NHANES measures 5 nutrients; CAERS covers 19 categories). Blank cells mean "no public data," not zero.

New · v1.0

Condition × Ingredient Evidence Crosswalk

The map of what's linked to what: 29 ingredients × 66 conditions/uses, 137 links. Each link carries a relationship type — is this ingredient a fix for a deficiency that causes the symptom, a studied therapeutic dose for the use, or a pair we've reviewed in depth — plus an evidence grade where one exists, the dose for that use, and the PubMed IDs behind it. Every row traces to a source: a PMID-bearing dataset or a researched page on this site. No invented pairs, no made-up grades.

⬇ Crosswalk CSV ⬇ Crosswalk JSON

Both granular and canonical condition IDs are included, so you can roll up (e.g. always-tired + energy-fatigueFatigue) or keep the specific page-level link.

More crosswalk tables

The supplement graph, sliced by other axes — every row carries its source. All CC BY 4.0.

Form × Bioavailability

39 forms across 18 ingredients — which form of each ingredient actually absorbs (glycinate vs oxide, methylfolate vs folic acid, ubiquinol vs ubiquinone), what it's best for, what to avoid it for, dose, and side-effects. The buying-decision data — and the formulation spec for a product line.

⬇ CSV ⬇ JSON

Medication × Nutrient Depletion

21 links across 8 common drug classes (PPIs, metformin, statins, SSRIs, oral contraceptives…) and 10 nutrients — severity, effect size, US users affected, mechanism, and PubMed IDs. Powers the medication-interaction pages and analyzer.

⬇ CSV ⬇ JSON

Population × Ingredient Need

16 links across 5 at-risk populations (pregnancy, vegan/vegetarian, adults 65+, menstruating women, post-bariatric) and 7 nutrients — deficiency prevalence ranges and what each risk compounds with. Powers demographic landing pages and personalization.

⬇ CSV ⬇ JSON

Why this dataset exists

Supplement information is scattered: clinical evidence sits in PubMed, product labels sit in the NIH DSLD, certifications sit across USP and NSF, and prices sit on retailer pages. Nobody joins them. So a simple question — "which product gives me the clinically-studied dose for the lowest cost per day, and how good is the evidence?" — has no single answer.

This dataset is that join. The column most people come for is cost_per_day_usd: not cost per pill or per serving, but the cost to take the dose actually used in trials. A $10 bottle and a $30 bottle routinely flip rankings once you normalize to the effective dose — and this is the only public dataset we know of that computes it across categories.

What's inside

  • 72 products across 16 categories (magnesium glycinate, omega-3, vitamin D3, CoQ10, creatine, iron bisglycinate, methylfolate, B12, and more)
  • Evidence grades on every row — 53 graded strong (systematic reviews / large RCTs), 19 moderate
  • PubMed IDs linking each category's grade to its underlying trials
  • Cost-per-effective-dose normalized to the clinically-studied dose, plus elemental dose, certification, and ASIN

Download

⬇ CSV (spreadsheet-ready) ⬇ JSON (with field definitions & metadata)

Prices reflect the catalog review of March 2026 — see our data-freshness policy. The live retailer price always governs at checkout.

Column reference

Fields in the CSV (the JSON uses camelCase equivalents plus typed values)
ColumnDescription
nameFull product name as listed by the manufacturer
brandBrand / manufacturer
categorySupplement category slug (e.g. magnesium-glycinate, omega-3)
formSpecific form (e.g. bisglycinate, ubiquinol, rTG triglyceride)
dose_per_servingElemental / active dose per serving — not compound weight
dose_unitmg, mcg, IU, g
serving_sizePhysical serving description
servings_per_containerServings per container
price_usdRetail price (Amazon US)
cost_per_day_usdCost to take the clinically-studied daily dose — our core normalization metric
third_party_certificationUSP, NSF, IFOS, Informed Sport, etc. (or None)
evidence_gradestrong / moderate / limited — by highest available evidence tier
primary_usePrimary clinical use case(s)
pubmed_idsPubMed IDs supporting the category evidence grade
editorial_pickOur pick label (best-value, quality, budget) if any
amazon_asinAmazon product identifier

How we built it

Doses are reported as elemental/active ingredient per serving (elemental magnesium, not magnesium glycinate compound weight; combined EPA+DHA, not "fish oil"). Cost-per-day is calculated as (price ÷ servings per container) × (clinical dose ÷ dose per serving). Evidence grades reflect the highest available tier — strong for systematic reviews and large RCTs, moderate for individual RCTs or strong observational data, limited for preliminary or mechanistic evidence. Full detail on our methodology page.

License & how to cite

This dataset is released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. You're free to use it commercially, remix it, and build on it — just credit the source. We'd genuinely love to see what you make.

Cite as:
Verified Supplement Data. (2026). Cost-per-Effective-Dose & Evidence Dataset (Version 1.0) [Data set]. https://verifiedsupplementdata.com/data/

Found an error or have a product to add? Email us — corrections are logged on our corrections page.

Related